WHICH Factors Affect Recovery the most?

An athlete’s ability to recover is influenced by many aspects—some within their control and some outside of it. Nutrition, sleep, and the overall structure of the training plan are among the most important.

However, two additional factors are often overlooked by both athletes and coaches, yet they play a critical role in recovery: age and training level.

01. Age

An athlete’s age has a significant impact on their ability to recover and adapt to training. Research shows that older athletes generally require longer recovery periods compared to younger athletes. For example, older athletes take more time to recover from eccentric contractions—movements that cause high levels of muscle damage. 

In addition to slower recovery, older athletes are generally more prone to injuries, including strains, tendon issues, and joint problems, because tissues become less resilient with age. This combination of slower recovery and higher injury risk highlights the importance of age-sensitive training strategies.

For this reason, when designing a training plan, coaches should carefully consider the athlete’s age and adjust both the intensity and recovery demands accordingly.

02. Training Level

The same training plan can produce very different outcomes depending on the athlete’s experience and development. For instance, a plan designed for a beginner might not provide enough stimulus for an advanced athlete, potentially leading to detraining—a decline in performance due to insufficient challenge.

As athletes progress, they require higher training loads and greater variation in training stimuli to continue improving. Interestingly, more experienced and physically developed athletes tend to recover faster compared to novices, as their bodies are better conditioned to handle training stress.

With nutrition, sleep, training structure, age, and training level all working together, athletes can optimize recovery, reduce injury risk, and sustain high performance over time.

More about this can be found on the Better is a Choice book.

Share your experience around recovery with me here.

——————

  • Baird, M. F., Graham, S. M., Baker, J. S., & Bickerstaff, G. F. (2012). Creatine-kinase- and exercise-related muscle damage implications for muscle performance and recovery. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2012, 960363.

  • Clarkson, P. M., & Hubal, M. J. (2002). Exercise-induced muscle damage in humans. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 81(11 Suppl), S52–S69.

  • Lavender, A. P., & Nosaka, K. (2006). Changes in fluctuation of isometric force following eccentric and concentric exercise of the elbow flexors. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 96(3), 235–240.

  • Lepers, R., & Stapley, P. J. (2016). Master Athletes Are Extending the Limits of Human Endurance. Frontiers in Physiology, 7, 613.

  • Sanchis-Moysi, J., Idoate, F., Izquierdo, M., Calbet, J. A., & Dorado, C. (2014). The impact of sports participation and ageing on the muscle mass of master athletes. Age, 36(2), 9630.

  • Stanley, J., D’Auria, S., & Buchheit, M. (2013). Cardiac parasympathetic reactivation following exercise: implications for training prescription. Sports Medicine, 43(12), 1259–1277.

Next
Next

Specificity & Transfer of training effect paradox